Federal judge refuses to block Trump's mail-in voting executive order

politics democracy elections legal proceedings

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has declined to block President Donald Trump's executive order tightening rules on mail-in voting. U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee, rejected the request from Democrats and civil rights groups who argued that the order would likely be found unconstitutional.

Democrats and civil rights groups argued that the order risks improperly excluding lawfully registered voters and could disenfranchise millions. They asserted that a restraining order was urgent as the country is in the midst of primary season and states are already gearing up for the fall midterm elections.

Judge Nichols stated that the legal challenge is premature as the administration moves to implement the measure, noting that it is too early to block the order restricting who can receive mail ballots. This decision occurs as Republicans face a challenging battle to retain control of both houses of Congress in the November midterm elections. Another judge may rule on the order soon.

US judge rejects immediate block on Trump’s mail-in voting executive order

aljazeera.com

Judge refuses to block Trump order to create federal voter list and limit mail voting

euronews.com

Federal judge declines to block order restricting mail-in voting

upi.com

Federal judge refuses to block Trump order to create federal voter list and limit mail voting

pbs.org

A federal judge in D.C. declines to block Trump's executive order on voting by mail

npr.org

Trump scores big court win as judge refuses to block mail-in voting crackdown

independent.co.uk

Judge allows Trump to implement mail-in voting executive order

straitstimes.com

Judge allows Trump to implement mail-in voting executive order

straitstimes.com